01 / Observable finding
ExampleCo appeared in 13% of a defined set of commercially relevant AI responses, while a leading competitor appeared in 57%.
- Illustrative company and data
- Time-bound observation
- Specific comparison context
- Evidence labeled by confidence
02 / Business meaning
The competitor may be entering the buyer's consideration set more often. The observation does not prove why it happened or guarantee that one correction will change future recommendations.
03 / What the client receives
A decision-ready explanation—not a data dump.
- What was observed
- Why it may matter
- Confidence and limitations
- Priority for deeper investigation
- The next business decision
04 / What remains private
QueryTrends does not publish the operating blueprint behind its analysis.
- Proprietary prompts and query architecture
- Scoring formulas and weighting
- Internal validation workflow
- Competitive research process
- Diagnostic decision rules
05 / The free Snapshot
A deliberately narrow first look designed to answer one question: is there a meaningful signal worth investigating? It does not include the complete diagnosis or remediation plan.
06 / The paid diagnosis
When deeper work is justified, the Audit connects multiple observable signals, separates facts from interpretation, and identifies which areas deserve attention first.
This page demonstrates the format and decision value of a finding. It is not a tutorial, methodology disclosure, client case study, or promise of results.